Editing Talk:Happiness

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Bentham thought that 'the good is whatever brings the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people', the Greatest Happiness Principle. This principle is strong, as it would seem to include all of the future, which, however has often proven difficult to put to practice, probably not least because predicting the future is infeasible.  
 
Bentham thought that 'the good is whatever brings the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people', the Greatest Happiness Principle. This principle is strong, as it would seem to include all of the future, which, however has often proven difficult to put to practice, probably not least because predicting the future is infeasible.  
  
Asking 'how there can be most happiness in a specific situation' when weighing different choices would seem the same utilitarian / consequentialist perspective.  
+
Asking 'how there can be most happiness' in a specific situation weighing different choices would seem the same thing. Assuming 'can' independently of a specific situation, would open the perspective of what can be possible within the limits of reality. This would avoid the necessity of prediction. The difference between our understanding of reality and reality itself remains, but it might still be a useful perspective.
 
 
Assuming, however, 'can' independently of a specific situation, would open the perspective of what can be possible within the limits of reality in order to get information on possible goals. This would avoid the necessity of prediction. The difference between our understanding of reality and reality itself remains, and practical implementation of such goals would still require decisions, but this question could add a useful perspective.
 

Please note that all contributions to Milliongenerations may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Milliongenerations:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)