Milliongenerations talk:Prize: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(elaborated on prize concept - user determined rather than panel determined) |
(Credibility, media interest) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A prize might be awarded to the most (positively) referenced contributor (or contribution). Some other mechanism in which the users themselves determine the outcome of the competitionin a pre-established (and transparent) system may also be viable. | A prize might be awarded to the most (positively) referenced contributor (or contribution). Some other mechanism in which the users themselves determine the outcome of the competitionin a pre-established (and transparent) system may also be viable. | ||
* A prize will provide credibility and authority to the project. | |||
* It will generate media interest for the [[Milliongenerations:purpose of milliongenerations.org|cause]] and people will start to think about the [[assumption]] and [[questions]]. | |||
* It may provide focus in the dialoge. | * It may provide focus in the dialoge. |
Revision as of 11:06, 11 March 2009
A prize might be awarded to the most (positively) referenced contributor (or contribution). Some other mechanism in which the users themselves determine the outcome of the competitionin a pre-established (and transparent) system may also be viable.
- A prize will provide credibility and authority to the project.
- It will generate media interest for the cause and people will start to think about the assumption and questions.
- It may provide focus in the dialoge.
- It may provide a way to attract contributiors.
- It may allow to establish rules for the discussion.
- The prize should be given out on the basis of a panel judgement but rather as a result of common judgment of the users themselves.
- Such a system would require separating the contributions of different users. Editing the contributions of others would probably first require citing and copying and then publishing a modified version.
- It would also require mechanisms to prevent fraud.
- Users may be allowed to use aliases, but could only cite/reference with one unique identity.