Milliongenerations talk:Prize: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MGxWikiSysop (talk | contribs) m (Talk:Prize moved to Milliongenerations talk:Prize: belongs to community) |
(elaborated on prize concept - user determined rather than panel determined) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A prize might be awarded to the most referenced | A prize might be awarded to the most (positively) referenced contributor (or contribution). Some other mechanism in which the users themselves determine the outcome of the competitionin a pre-established (and transparent) system may also be viable. | ||
It may provide focus in the dialoge. | * It may provide focus in the dialoge. | ||
It may provide a way to attract contributiors. | * It may provide a way to attract contributiors. | ||
It may allow to establish rules for the discussion. | * It may allow to establish rules for the discussion. | ||
* The prize should be given out on the basis of a panel judgement but rather as a result of common judgment of the users themselves. | |||
* Such a system would require separating the contributions of different users. Editing the contributions of others would probably first require citing and copying and then publishing a modified version. | |||
Users may be allowed to use aliases, but could only cite/reference with one unique identity. | * It would also require mechanisms to prevent fraud. | ||
* Users may be allowed to use aliases, but could only cite/reference with one unique identity. | |||
Revision as of 00:57, 2 December 2008
A prize might be awarded to the most (positively) referenced contributor (or contribution). Some other mechanism in which the users themselves determine the outcome of the competitionin a pre-established (and transparent) system may also be viable.
- It may provide focus in the dialoge.
- It may provide a way to attract contributiors.
- It may allow to establish rules for the discussion.
- The prize should be given out on the basis of a panel judgement but rather as a result of common judgment of the users themselves.
- Such a system would require separating the contributions of different users. Editing the contributions of others would probably first require citing and copying and then publishing a modified version.
- It would also require mechanisms to prevent fraud.
- Users may be allowed to use aliases, but could only cite/reference with one unique identity.