Talk:Related topics: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
->''The following contribution by 196.12.225.116 on 19:52, 28 September 2008 does not seem to contain a lot of information on related topics, but would fit rather well into the discussion of the assumption. Propose to move it to the discussion page for the assumption: [[Talk:Assumption]]. Please remove comment when moving. Thanks!''
->
-The assumption, that civilisation will continue is not a very prophetic one. Why shouldn’t it? It will continue until it will collapse. It looks like it will collapse some day, nevertheless it may take a while. As we are running to a certain extent this civilisation we seem to approve it. Thus to me it appears that for us two questions arise:
-How can we prevent it form collapsing due to our way of living?
-Civilisation will change. So which way do we want it to change it in order to improve living conditions and what should can we do to prolong its existence?
-Or maybe civilisation is endless. Doesn’t seem very probable to me. But for myself it will be endless. So why not assume it?
-<

Revision as of 14:43, 29 December 2008